Legal Opinion

Eriksmoen v. Director, North Dakota Department of Transportation

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 2005No. 20050129PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Kjerstin Eriksmoen appeals from a district court judgment upholding a Department of Transportation’s three-year revocation of Eriksmoen’s driving privileges for refusing to take an intoxilyzer test. Eriksmoen argues she was denied an adequate opportunity to consult with her attorney. We affirm.

I

[¶2] Eriksmoen was driving several passengers home from a wedding reception. Highway Patrol Officer Troy Hischer was following Eriksmoen when he noticed Eriksmoen turn on her right blinker in the right-turn-only lane, but then proceed to make a left turn on to 32nd Avenue in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kuntz v. State Highway CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Bickler v. North Dakota State Highway CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Messer v. BenderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. City of Mandan v. JewettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Lee v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kasowski v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. PaceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. LeeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  4. City of Dickinson v. SchankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Lentz v. SpryncznatykNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API