Eriksmoen v. Director, North Dakota Department of Transportation
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Kjerstin Eriksmoen appeals from a district court judgment upholding a Department of Transportation’s three-year revocation of Eriksmoen’s driving privileges for refusing to take an intoxilyzer test. Eriksmoen argues she was denied an adequate opportunity to consult with her attorney. We affirm.
I
[¶2] Eriksmoen was driving several passengers home from a wedding reception. Highway Patrol Officer Troy Hischer was following Eriksmoen when he noticed Eriksmoen turn on her right blinker in the right-turn-only lane, but then proceed to make a left turn on to 32nd Avenue in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kuntz v. State Highway CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Bickler v. North Dakota State Highway CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Messer v. BenderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- City of Mandan v. JewettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Lee v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kasowski v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. PaceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. LeeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- City of Dickinson v. SchankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Lentz v. SpryncznatykNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.