Legal Opinion

Hostetler v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 23, 1961No. 8185PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

For many years the appellants had been employees of the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company and members of the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen (BRT). In September, 1951, the B. & *458O. and BRT entered into a union shop agreement, pursuant to the Railway Labor Act,1 requiring employees in the crafts represented by BRT to become, as a condition of continued employment, members of that or of another union national in scope and organized in accordance with the Act. At various times in the fall of 1952 these appellants stopped paying dues to the Brotherhood and joined a newly formed labor…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Tunstall v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & EnginemenSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Pennsylvania Railroad v. RychlikSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fred Thompson v. Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters, an Unincorporated Railroad Labor Organization, National in ScopeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
  2. Rumbaugh v. Winifrede Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
  3. Haley v. ChildersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
  4. Thompson v. International Association of MacHinistsDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1966
  5. Wade v. Southern Pacific CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API