Legal Opinion
Rogers v. Bucks County Domestic Relations Section
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 12, 1991No. C.A. 90-7102PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
WEINER, District Judge.
Introduction
Plaintiffs Patricia Rogers, Gregory Rogers, Jr. and Marvin Rogers have brought this cause of action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on their own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated. The lawsuit, which also includes several pendent state law claims, challenges the policies and procedures employed by the defendants in the Tax Refund Intercept Program (TRIP). TRIP is a mechanism to satisfy past due child support obligations, arising from state court decrees, by intercepting and paying over to the custodial spouse…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Webb's Fabulous Pharmacies, Inc. v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rogers v. Bucks County Domestic Relations SectionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Blumberg v. Pinellas CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1993
- Rogers v. Bucks County Domestic Relations SectionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992