Legal Opinion
Rogers v. Bucks County Domestic Relations Section
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 30, 1992No. 91-1670PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
COWEN, Circuit Judge.
Patricia Rogers and her two children (collectively “the Rogers” or “plaintiffs”), the appellants in this matter, are participants in the Tax Refund Intercept Program (TRIP), a federal program to intercept tax refunds from delinquent parents to satisfy their past-due child support obligations. The state and county agencies which implement TRIP in Pennsylvania intercepted $6,950.94, and held the funds for four months before distributing them to the Rogers.
The Rogers have requested interest on this child support money. They have brought this action…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Webb's Fabulous Pharmacies, Inc. v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Haybarger v. Lawrence County Adult Probation & ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Desvi, Inc., on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Continental Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Holt Cargo Systems, Inc. v. Delaware River Port AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- Amoco Production Co. v. FryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1995
- River Nile Invalid Coach & Ambulance, Inc. v. VelezDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.