Legal Opinion

Culclasure v. Comm'r of the Soc. Sec. Admin.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 2019No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-1543PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKearney, District Judge

Michael Culclasure challenges the denial of disability insurance benefits by a Social Security Administration administrative law judge who - everyone now agrees - was not properly appointed under Article II of the Constitution. Consistent with the Administration's and the Solicitor General's July 2018 internal memoranda responsive to the Supreme Court's June 21, 2018 holding in Lucia v. Securities and Exchange Commission , the Commissioner concedes the constitutional infirmity but argues Mr. Culclasure forfeited his challenge by not timely raising it in July 2017 to the same infirmed judge…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Sims v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Freytag v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Lucia v. SECSupreme Court of the United States · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Muhammad v. BerryhillDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Wilson v. BerryhillDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. ACEVEDO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. ANDERSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. BRADY v. BERRYHILLDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API