Legal Opinion

Muhammad v. Berryhill

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 23, 2019No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-172PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAPPERT, District Judge.

Musa Saeed Muhammad seeks judicial review of the Commissioner of Social Security's denial of his application for Disability Insurance Benefits ("DIB") under Title II of the Social Security Act. Muhammad contends, among other things, that the Administrative Law Judge who presided over his hearing lacked the authority to decide his case because she was not appointed in the manner prescribed by the Constitution's Appointments Clause. The Commissioner acknowledges the infirmity of the appointment but contends that Muhammad forfeited his right to assert such a claim by not…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Carr v. Commissioner, SSACourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
  2. ACEVEDO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. ANDERSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. BRINK v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. BRITO v. BERRYHILLDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API