Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Berryhill
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 14, 2019No. CIVIL ACTION No. 18-4862PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Timothy R. Rice, U.S. Magistrate Judge
The notion that claims of legal error must be preserved at trial for appellate review is a bedrock tenet of our legal system. See, e.g., Judiciary Act § 25, 1 Stat 86 ("no other error shall be assigned or regarded as a ground of reversal ... than such as appears on the face of the record"); Crowell v. Randell, 35 U.S. 368, 391, 10 Pet. 368, 9 L.Ed. 458 (1836) (if it does not appear on the record that an issue has been raised and decided in the lower court, "appellate jurisdiction fails"). Not only does it afford the presiding jurist an opportunity to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Sims v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- DAVIS v. BERRYHILLDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- HILL, JR. v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- VanHorn v. Social Security Administration, CommissionerDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2020