Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Hill

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 29, 1986No. WD 37579PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TURNAGE, Judge.

USF & G filed an action for declaratory judgment against the Hills seeking a declaration that under an insurance policy the Hills were required to submit to examinations separate and apart from each other. The court held that an examination may be made of each insured separately but within the presence of the other insured. USF & G now contends the court erred in refusing to declare that the examination of the Hills would be made separately and out of the presence of the other insured. Affirmed.

USF & G issued a homeowners insurance policy to Danny Hill. His wife, Stephanie, was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Madison Block Pharmacy, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  2. Central Surety & Insurance v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  3. Henderson v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  4. Shelter Insurance Companies v. SpenceCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lidawi v. Progressive County Mutual Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  2. Jones v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  3. Ahmadi v. Allstate Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. TanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1988
  5. Insurance From CNA v. Keene Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API