Legal Opinion

In Re Mendes

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 23, 1991No. 89-528PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The District of Columbia Court of Appeals Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) recommends disbarment of respondent Fortunato Mendes pursuant to D.C.Code § 11-2503(a) (1989 Repl.). Seetion 11-1503(a) requires the disbarment of any member of the bar who is convicted of a criminal offense involving “Moral turpitude.” Pursuant to statutory requirements and the rules of this court, the final disbarment may not issue until after judgment of final appeal in the criminal case, however, appellant has been suspended since our order of July 13, 1989. D.C.App.R. XI, Section 10(d); D.C.Code §…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of ColsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Mendes v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mercer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Minor v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Goldberg. Marchesano. Kohlman. Inc. v. Old Republic Surety Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. In Re HirschfeldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. In Re MatzkinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API