Legal Opinion

Minor v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 27, 1993No. 91-CF-1014PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, convicted of distribution of heroin,1 possession of heroin,2 and possession of drug paraphernalia,3 contends on appeal that the trial court erred in failing to give three jury instructions that he requested. He argues first that, with respect to the first count of the indictment, the court improperly refused to give an instruction on possession of heroin as a lesser included offense within the crime of distribution. Second, he maintains that he was entitled to an instruction on the primary theory of his defense, namely, that he was acting as an “agent of the buyer” in the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Mathews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Keeble v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Mack v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Jefferson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. State v. AllenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  5. Lowman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API