Legal Opinion

Tuohy v. Boynton

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 26, 1949PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The notice of appeal in this case was signed by J. Bernard Rogovoy as attorney for the Welfare Director of Salem. But the Director makes affidavit that he is satisfied with the judgment of the court below and did not authorize Mr. Rogovoy to appeal or to appear for him at all in the cause. The appeal will therefore be dismissed with costs, which Mr. Rogovoy must pay and not leave them to be borne by the Welfare Director. The suit was a bastardy action prosecuted pursuant to R.S. 9:17-1 et seq., and removed by appeal to the county court, where a verdict was directed for the putative father.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kopack v. PolzerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  2. Kaufman v. SmathersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. ArbusNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  2. M. v. F.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  3. M. v. F.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  4. Horby v. KingNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  5. State v. WeissNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API