Legal Opinion

Bally v. State Farm Life Insurance Company

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 28, 2021No. 3:18-cv-04954Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 ELIZABETH A. BALLY, Case No. 18-cv-04954-CRB 9 Plaintiff, ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR 10 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT 11 STATE FARM LIFE INSURANCE Re: Dkts. 142 and 191 COMPANY, 12 Defendant. 13 Elizabeth Bally has brought suit against State Farm Life Insurance Company on behalf of a 14 class of policyholders. See Complaint (Dkt. 1). Bally claims that State Farm improperly 15 considered profit, expenses, and other non-mortality factors in calculating the cost of insurance 16 rates in class members’ policies. See…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Devereaux v. AbbeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API