Legal Opinion

State v. Gartland

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 18, 1983No. C5-82-1486PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from sentences imposed in district court for the deaths of two people resulting from defendant’s criminal negligence in driving his automobile. The issues are (1) whether multiple sentencing, using the so-called Hernandez method of computing a defendant’s criminal history score, was barred by Minn.Stat. § 609.035 (1982), and (2) whether the record fails to support the trial court’s dispositional departure in the form of execution of a presumptively stayed sentence. We affirm.

Defendant, who is 27 years old, has a history of drug and alcohol abuse. He…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. State v. HernandezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. STATE, CTY. OF HENNEPIN v. McClaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. State v. MarquardtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  2. State v. HagenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. State v. SkipinthedaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  4. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. State v. LoitzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API