Legal Opinion
State v. Skipintheday
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 13, 2006No. A04-1293PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEYER, Justice.
In this ease, the state seeks review of the court of appeals’ sentencing decisions regarding respondent Todd Skipintheday. Skipintheday pleaded guilty under Minn. Stat. § 609.495, subd. 3 (2004), to three counts of being an accomplice after-the-fact to crimes arising from a three-victim shooting in Redwood Falls, Minnesota, on July 12, 2003. The district court determined that Skipintheday committed multiple-victim crimes, and therefore gave Ski-pintheday a separate sentence for each of the three counts. The court of appeals reversed, determining that the crime of being…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Bangert v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- State v. MorrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- State Ex Rel. Stangvik v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. YangSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- United States v. NatalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- Wallace v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. AmundsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.