Legal Opinion
Edward Lee Provau v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided September 30, 1985No. 84-9015PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Per curiam
This appeal involves the question whether “stacking” of medical payment coverage under three separate insurance policies is permitted under Georgia law. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant-insurer, finding Georgia law does not permit stacking. We disagree and therefore reverse.
I. FACTS
The material facts of this case are undisputed. Appellee State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”) issued three separate policies of insurance to appellant Edward Provau. The first policy insured a 1980 Dodge pickup, and the medical payment coverage was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Silverberg v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Nora Faye Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- The Flintkote Company v. Dravo Corporation, Diamond Manufacturing Company, Inc. And B. F. Diamond Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Dolgencorp, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Sphinx International, Inc. v. National Union Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Marlene Studstill v. Borg Warner Leasing, a Division of Borg Warner Acceptance Corporation, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- SCI Liquidating Corp. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- State Auto Mutual Insurance v. McIntyre Ex Rel. BuckDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1987
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.