Legal Opinion

Martiny v. Wells

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1966No. 9866PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Justice.

At the times here involved both parties were owners of rights to the use of water for irrigation from Spring Creek, in Lemhi County. Both rights were adjudicated by the Morrow-Wagoner decree in 1910. The right held by plaintiffs (appellants) was decreed to have a priority date of February 10, 1893, and the right held by defendant (respondent) was decreed to have a priority date of July 15, 1900.

Plaintiffs brought this action for damages resulting from defendant’s alleged interference with plaintiffs’ water right and to enjoin future interference therewith.

Running generally…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McCall v. PorterOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Dehaas v. BeneschSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  3. State ex rel. Cary v. CochranNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  4. McClellan v. HurdleColorado Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Proctor v. JenningsNevada Supreme Court · 1870

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Village of Peck v. DenisonIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Gilbert v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Jenkins v. State, Dept. of Water ResourcesIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Crow v. CarlsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Stevenson v. SteeleIdaho Supreme Court · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API