Hochheiser v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THOMPSON, J.
—Petitioner Zef Hochheiser seeks a writ of prohibition restraining the superior court from enforcing its order directing the taking of the complaining victims’ testimony by closed-circuit television from outside the courtroom. Petitioner contends the order constitutes an impermissible invocation of judicial power to create procedural rules unauthorized by statute which seriously risk encroaching on his constitutional rights.
This case presents an issue of first impression in this state concerning the power of the trial court, in the absence of specific statutory enabling…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, County of NorfolkSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Commonwealth v. AmiraultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Commonwealth v. BergstromMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
- People v. DiefenderferSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Wildermuth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.