Legal Opinion

Hochheiser v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 9, 1984No. B005940PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THOMPSON, J.

—Petitioner Zef Hochheiser seeks a writ of prohibition restraining the superior court from enforcing its order directing the taking of the complaining victims’ testimony by closed-circuit television from outside the courtroom. Petitioner contends the order constitutes an impermissible invocation of judicial power to create procedural rules unauthorized by statute which seriously risk encroaching on his constitutional rights.

This case presents an issue of first impression in this state concerning the power of the trial court, in the absence of specific statutory enabling…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, County of NorfolkSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Commonwealth v. AmiraultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  3. Commonwealth v. BergstromMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  4. People v. DiefenderferSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  5. Wildermuth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API