Rush v. Lake
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the District of Washington. This is an appeal from the judgment of the District Court allowing the claim of the appellee against the firm of E. C. Clark, bankrupt. Clark had entered into business at Spokane, Wash., about August 1, 1899, with G. J. Reiter, under the firm name of Clark & Reiter.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the District of Washington. This is an appeal from the judgment of the District Court allowing the claim of the appellee against the firm of E. C. Clark, bankrupt. Clark had entered into business at Spokane, Wash., about August 1, 1899, with G. J. Reiter, under the firm name of Clark & Reiter. On June 1, 1900, Reiter sold his interest in the firm to Clark for the sum of $400 cash, Clark assuming and agreeing to pay off the existing debts against the firm. At that time the firm was owing, according to the findings…
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, Circuit Judge
The appellee contends that the court on this appeal is precluded from entering into a consideration of the question of fact presented in the record, for the reason that the appeal was not taken within io days from the date when the District Court passed upon that question as it was presented to him on the petition of Lake. But the record does not show that any order or judgment was made by the District Court upon that hearing. It is true that the District Judge filed an opinion which is reported in Re Clark, 111 Fed. 893, but nothing further was done, and the conclusion of the court was never…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re ClarkDistrict Court, D. Washington · 1901
3Cited by8 opinions
- De Watteville v. SimsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- In Re RuskayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- In re RiceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1908
- Bartleson v. FeidlerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Washington · 1906
- In re Brookstone Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.