In re Brookstone Mfg. Co.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Petition by the Brookstone Manufacturing Company and others for mandamus or prohibition or certiorari.
1Opinion of the Court
DODGE, Circuit Judge.
[1] The objections specified by these petitioners to an accepted composition were heard by the District Judge August 30, 1916. Their petition states that on September 1, 1916, he “handed down, and had filed, an opinion, a copy of which is hereto annexed, marked ‘A,’ confirming the composition offered.” The paper thus described is dated August 31, 1916. Though called an “opinion” in the petition, it is not so entitled, nor is it otherwise entitled. The clerk’s docket entry was: “September 1, 1916, opinion, Hale, J., confirming composition filed.” The answer of the District…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Snell v. DwightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Rush v. LakeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1903
- Ross v. SaundersCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1901
- Herrick v. CutcheonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1893
- In re Bay State Milling Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re GottliebCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919