Legal Opinion

Denise Rounds, Thomas Rounds vs Genzyme Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 8, 2011No. 11-11025UnpublishedCited by 8 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs-Appellants Denise and Thomas Rounds (“the Rounds”) appeal from the district court’s final order dismissing for failure to state a claim their negligence action against Defendant-Appellee Gen-zyme Corporation (“Genzyme”). On appeal, the Rounds argue that the district court erred in dismissing their complaint because: (1) the complaint properly contains a short and plain statement showing that they are entitled to relief; and (2) the learned intermediary doctrine is inapplicable. After careful review, we affirm.

We review de novo the district court’s grant of a motion to dismiss for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Felix v. Hoffmann-LaRoche, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. Horowitch v. DIAMOND AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIES, INC.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  3. Buckner v. Allergan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. Beale v. Biomet, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2007
  5. Donna Ellis v. C. R. Bard, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Joseph Mink v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
  2. Tillman v. C.R. Bard, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2015
  3. Metz v. Wyeth, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2012
  4. Lederman v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2013
  5. Bryan v. C.R. Bard, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API