Legal Opinion
Lederman v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided June 19, 2013No. Case No. 8:13-cv-506-T-30AEPPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JAMES S. MOODY, JR., District Judge.
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Defendant Howmedica Osteonics Corp.’s Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (Dkt. 31), Defendant Howmedica Osteonics Corp.’s Notice of Supplemental Authority • (Dkt. 32), and Plaintiff -Paul E. Lederman’s Response in Opposition (Dkt. 33). The Court, having reviewed the motion, response, supplemental authority, and being otherwise advised in the premises, concludes that the motion should be granted without prejudice to Plaintiff to amend his complaint a final time.
*1248 DISCUSSION
This removed case is a medical device…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Manuel Davila v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Wolicki-Gables v. Arrow International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Marmol v. St. Jude Medical CenterDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2015
- Brown v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2013
- Mink v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2016