Legal Opinion

Satellite Earth Stations East, Inc. v. Davis

Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)

Decided July 28, 1988No. 11-87-229-CVPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ARNOT, Justice.

Appellant, Satellite Earth Stations East, Inc., sued to recover for electronic goods it sold on an open account to appellee, Frank Davis d/b/a Hi-Tech Electronics. Davis filed a counterclaim, asserting that Satellite violated the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices — Consumer Protection Act, TEX. BUS. & COM.CODE ANN. sec. 17.41 et seq. (Vemon 1987), by misrepresenting the goods sold. The jury found that Davis owed Satellite $3,445.15 on the account, that Satellite was entitled to recover its attorneys’ fees of $2,600.00, that Davis had been damaged by Satellite's…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McKinley v. DrozdTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Doerfler v. Espensen Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1983
  3. Streeter v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Murrco Agency, Inc. v. Ryan, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  2. Bankhead v. Maddox, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2004
  3. Cone v. Fagadau Energy Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2002
  4. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co. v. Portilla, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1992
  5. Formosa Plastics Corp. v. Presidio Engineers & Contractors, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API