Legal Opinion

Naugle-Leck, Inc. v. Bursch

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 24, 1972No. 43500PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Harold W. Schultz, Justice.*

This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying defendants’ motion for amended findings or a new trial.

The case arises out of an action brought by Naugle-Leck, Incorporated, to register title to certain land in Anoka County. In the registration action, a petition for summons, pursuant to *35order of the court, was served upon Harry D. Fleischer and Doloras S. Fleischer and others. Defendants Fleischer were the only defendants to answer and claim ownership of some of the land in question.

The record indicates that in 1955 Theodore A. Dworak owned land in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kiges v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  2. Gartner v. GartnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  3. Golden Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Super Valu Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  4. Taylor v. LindenmannSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  5. Lattin v. GrayNevada Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Trigg v. TriggSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API