Legal Opinion

State v. Gilkey

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 12, 1992No. 89CR1320; CA A66860PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

The issue is whether a trial court may impose, as a condition of probation, a requirement that defendant receive permission from the court or a probation officer before he contacts his wife.

In 1989, defendant pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance (methamphetamine). ORS 475.992(4)(a). He was placed on two years’ probation. In the probation revocation proceeding from which he appeals, defendant admitted that he had violated the conditions of his probation by committing the crime of assaulting his wife; in return, the state dismissed charges of assault and harassment, also…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. SpragueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Farris v. HutchinsonMontana Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. KlineCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. State v. QuackenbushCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. State v. MaackCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. State v. SaxonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API