Legal Opinion

Molinares v. City Heights

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 4, 2015No. 1 CA-IC 14-0039Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE. IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE CARLOS MOLINARES, Petitioner, v. THE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA, Respondent, CITY HEIGHTS, LLC. /OMAR MARTINEZ AND EUGENIA PALOMINO, husband and wife, FRED C. ANDREWS AND CYNTHIA FORD ANDREWS, husband and wife, Respondent Employers, SPECIAL FUND DIVISION/NO INSURANCE SECTION, Respondent Party in Interest. No. 1 CA-IC 14-0039 FILED 6-4-2015 Special Action - Industrial Commission…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Young v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  2. Lovitch v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  3. Putz v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  4. Southwest Nurseries v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  5. Wood v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZ.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API