State v. Henderson
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Morgah Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.
— Indictment for perjury against the appellee. His motion to quash was sustained. The State excepted, and by a proper assignment of error in this -court presents for our consideration the question of the sufficiency of the indictment.
The appellee, as charged in the indictment, was a person under the age of twenty-one years. He was, on November 21st, 1882, summoned before the grand jury asa witness and was duly sworn by the foreman.
The indictment then alleges: “And it then and there be*407■came a material matter, and was the point in question by and before and with said grand jury, as to whether…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. WoolvertonIndiana Supreme Court · 1847
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. . DoodyNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Mannos v. Bishop-Babcock-Becker Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1914
- People v. DoodyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- People v. DoodyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902