Legal Opinion

State v. Henderson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1883No. 11,097PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Morgah Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

— Indictment for perjury against the appellee. His motion to quash was sustained. The State excepted, and by a proper assignment of error in this -court presents for our consideration the question of the sufficiency of the indictment.

The appellee, as charged in the indictment, was a person under the age of twenty-one years. He was, on November 21st, 1882, summoned before the grand jury asa witness and was duly sworn by the foreman.

The indictment then alleges: “And it then and there be*407■came a material matter, and was the point in question by and before and with said grand jury, as to whether…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. WoolvertonIndiana Supreme Court · 1847

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. . DoodyNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Mannos v. Bishop-Babcock-Becker Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1914
  3. People v. DoodyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  4. People v. DoodyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API