Legal Opinion
Andre Marcus Bragg v. Warden Galaza
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 12, 2001No. 99-16636PublishedCited by 136 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RONALD M. GOULD, Circuit Judge:
Andre Marcus Bragg (“Bragg”) petitions for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, as amended by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1218 (“AEDPA”). Bragg appeals the district court’s order denying his habeas corpus petition, arguing that he received ineffective assistance of counsel during his murder trial in California state court. We affirm and hold that (1) Bragg cannot establish ineffective assistance of counsel on the factually inadequate record before us; and (2) AEDPA does not permit us…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sumner v. MataSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- William George Bonin v. Arthur Calderon, as Warden of San Quentin State Prison James Rowland, Director of the California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by136 opinions
- In Re DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- In re the Personal Restraint of DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Earp v. OrnoskiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Ahmad J. Hasan v. George M. GalazaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Jose Enrique Alberni v. E.K. McDaniel Frankie Sue Del Papa State of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.