Legal Opinion

Baker ex rel. Baker v. Flint & Pere Marquette Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1888PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to Bay. (G-age, J., presiding.) Case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, C. J.

The plaintiff in this case, a boy seven years and three months old, brings this action to recover damages for personal injuries received by him from being run over by the defendant’s train of cars on the evening of the fifth day of November, 18S6, at Eleventh street, in Bay City, whereby he was seriously injured, and from the effects of which amputation of one of his legs became necessary.

The cause was tried in the Bay circuit court, and the plaintiff recovered a verdict and judgment for the sum of $5,000 damages. The defendant brings error.

The defendant’s road enters Bay City near its most…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Powers v. HarlowMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. East Saginaw City Railway Co. v. BohnMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Ecliff v. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Chicago & Northwestern Ry. Co. v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Hassenyer v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ryan v. TowarMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Knickerbocker v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Trudell v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Henderson v. Detroit Citizens' Street-Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Young v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 1897

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API