Legal Opinion
Kezer v. Mark Stimson Associates
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided December 15, 1999PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCalkins, J.
[¶ 1] Edward and Donna Kezer appeal from the summary judgment (Cumberland County, Cole, J.) entered in favor of the defendants Mark Stimson Associates, Mark Stimson, Dawn Klein, Joyce Frost (the Stimson defendants), and Thomas and Beth Peaslee. On appeal, the Kezers contend that the trial court erred when it failed to recognize that they had generated a genuine issue of material fact. We affirm the judgment.
I. FACTS 1
[¶ 2] This controversy concerns the purchase of a house and real estate on Harris Road in Cumberland by the Kezers from the Peaslees. The Peaslees listed the sale of their home…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Champagne v. Mid-Maine Medical CenterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
- Bryan R. v. Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of New York, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Binette v. Dyer Library Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Fitzgerald v. GamesterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- Chadwick-BaRoss, Inc. v. T. Buck Construction, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Pleasantdale Condominiums, LLC v. WakefieldCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022
- Guilford Transportation Industries v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Rared Manchester NH LLC v. Rite Aid of New Hampshire IncCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- McGeechan v. SherwoodSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- In Re Hannaford Bros. Co. Customer Data Security Breach LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.