Legal Opinion
Posttape Associates v. Eastman Kodak Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 11, 1975No. 72-1009PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HUYETT, District Judge.
Plaintiff Posttape Associates, a limited partnership formed to produce a documentary film, filed this diversity action against defendant Eastman Kodak *326Company, a manufacturer and seller of photographic film. Plaintiff alleged that (1) to produce a documentary film, plaintiff purchased Ektachrome Commercial film manufactured and sold by defendant, (2) plaintiff used the film to shoot part of the documentary film, “Childhood II”, (3) during the processing of the film marks were discovered on the film which made the film commercially useless, (4) the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Dan Lind v. Schenley Industries IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- Eichel v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Neville Chemical Company v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Tipton v. Socony Mobil Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Posttape Associates v. Eastman Kodak CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Gajewski v. BratcherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- O'SHAUGHNESSY v. BesseMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- Edward J. Rich v. United States Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- New England Acceptance Corp. v. American Manufacturers Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.