Legal Opinion
Marriage of Chafin v. Rude
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 5, 1986No. C6-85-2242PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
During dissolution proceedings in 1981, the parties entered into a stipulation for joint legal and physical custody of their one-year-old son. In March 1982 respondent Mark Rude moved for a change of custody. Appellant Cheryl Chafin did the same. The trial court awarded sole legal and physical custody to the mother in March 1983. The father again moved for a custody change in January 1985. The trial court granted the motion and Chafin appealed. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Cheryl Chafin and respondent Mark Rude were married in 1979. Their son Garrett was born in 1980. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Marriage of Pikula v. PikulaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Thayer v. American Financial Advisers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State on Behalf of Gunderson v. PreussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Morton v. Board of Com'rs of Ramsey CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Marriage of Rinker v. RinkerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Amarreh v. AmarrehCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018