Legal Opinion
Thurmond v. Drive Automotive Industries of America, Inc.
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided September 25, 2013No. Civil Action No. 6:12-2758-TMC-KFMPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
TIMOTHY M. CAIN, District Judge.
In her complaint, the plaintiff, Temmessia Thurmond (“Thurmond”), alleges that the defendant, Drive Automotive Industries of America, Inc. (“Drive”), violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by creating a hostile work environment and then retaliating against her when she initiated proceedings under Title VII and internal complaint procedures. (Complaint, ECF No. 1.) In turn, pursuant to certain contracts between the two parties, Drive has brought an action for contribution and indemnification against third party defendant, Employ Bridge of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Mathews v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cordova v. FedEx Ground Package Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2015
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. TCI of Alabama, LLC; TCI of Alabama, LLC v. Onin Staffing, LLC, et al.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2026
- MANESS v. THE VILLAGE OF PINEHURST, NORTH CAROLINADistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2021