Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. Slaby v. Summit County Council

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 14, 1983No. 11059, 11071, 11072, and 11073PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

These cases, which have been consolidated for the purpose of argument and disposition, are actions in mandamus brought by the judges of the court of common pleas and the prosecuting attorney. The relators seek orders compelling the Summit County Council (“County Council”) to appropriate funds reasonable and necessary for their respective operations. For the reasons set forth herein, we grant each writ.

The matters have been submitted to us on agreed stipulations of facts. Thus, the questions presented are ones of law and not disputes of fact.

Before discussing the issues raised, it is just as…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. COM. Ex Rel. CARROLL v. TATESupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Carroll v. TateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. State ex rel. Cleveland Municipal Court v. Cleveland City CouncilOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  4. NOBLE CTY. COUNCIL ETC. v. State Ex Rel. FiferIndiana Supreme Court · 1955
  5. State ex rel. Johnston v. TaulbeeOhio Supreme Court · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Wilke v. Hamilton County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State ex rel. Wilke v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API