Legal Opinion
Autoliv ASP, Inc. v. Department of Workforce Services
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided June 28, 2001No. 20000574-CAPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BILLINGS, Judge:
T1 Autoliv ASP, Inc. (Autoliv) appeals from a decision of the Workforce Appeals Board (Board) granting Christopher Guzman and Thomas King unemployment benefits. Autoliv argues that Guzman and King were discharged for just cause and are thus ineligible for unemployment benefits. We agree and thus reverse and remand.
BACKGROUND
12 Autoliv provides its over 6,000 employees with an employee handbook. The poli-cles in the handbook that are relevant here include Autoliv's general rules of conduct, its anti-harassment policy, and its policy regarding computer usage.
8 Autoliv's…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Shirley A. Yamaguchi v. United States Department of the Air Force, and Sheila E. Widnall, Officially as Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Retherford v. AT & T Communications of the Mountain States, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1992
- Ralph Greenslade v. Chicago Sun-Times, Inc., and Chicago Newspaper Guild, Local 71Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Opp v. Source One Management, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Foster-Glocester Regional School Committee v. Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
- EAGALA, INC. v. Department of Workforce ServicesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
- Smith v. Workforce Appeals Board, Department of Workforce ServicesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
- Arrow Legal Solutions Group v. Department of Workforce ServicesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
- Carbon County v. Department of Workforce ServicesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.