Legal Opinion

Harrington Manufacturing Co. v. Logan Tontz Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 3, 1979No. 786SC377PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

The issues submitted to and answered by the jury do not resolve the controversy between the parties disclosed by the evidence. While warranties are involved, the issues raised by the evidence are more complex and involve principles of law either not considered or incorrectly applied by the trial court. Since the error appearing in this record has been only indirectly raised and discussed by the defendant in its brief, it is unnecessary for us to discuss separately each of its several assignments of error in this opinion. We confine our discussion to what we perceive to be the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Performance Motors, Incorporated v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Dopieralla v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  3. Davis v. Vintage Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  4. The Four Sons Bakery, Inc. v. DulmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Warren v. Guttanit, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Bicknell v. B & S ENTERPRISESCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  3. Wright v. O'Neal Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. EPN-Delaval, S.A. v. Inter-Equip, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1982
  5. Prichard Enterprises, Inc. v. AdkinsDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API