Legal Opinion

Wright v. O'Neal Motors, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 4, 1982No. 8110DC715PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

The question presented by this appeal is whether the trial court properly allowed defendants’ motions for summary judgment.

I. Summary Judgment As To Defendant O’Neal Motors, Inc.

In plaintiff’s verified complaint, he alleged that on 15 November 1980, he purchased, for cash, a new Plymouth “Reliant K” automobile from O’Neal Motors, and that:

II. Plaintiff accepted the automobile in the belief that the automobile conformed to the contract of sale. On November 16, 1980, plaintiff discovered that the automobile did not conform to the contract inasmuch as plaintiff experienced a roaring…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ragsdale v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Lowe v. BradfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Durfee v. Rod Baxter Imports, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Vassey v. BurchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Conte v. Dwan Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gochey v. Bombardier, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  2. Neal v. SMC Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
  3. Henderson v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Fode v. Capital RV Center, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Hines v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API