People v. Vail
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Mikoll, J.
Defendant seeks a reversal of his convictions based on County Court’s denial of his motion to suppress a statement given by him to police implicating him in the crimes of which he was convicted. Defendant contends that the People violated his right to counsel in that at the time the statement was taken, he was represented on other charges by counsel and that the People manipulated the dismissal of the unrelated charges for purposes of avoiding the rules set out in People v Rogers (48 NY2d 167) and People v Bartolomeo (53 NY2d 225).
Subsequent to Rogers (supra) and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Desist v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- People v. RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. BingNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. BartolomeoNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. AdamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. MelvinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. VannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. MunckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.