Legal Opinion

Souran v. Souran

Suffolk County District Court

Decided January 24, 1975PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlfred M. Lama, J.

The matter before the court concerns itself with the nonpayment, of alimony to. plaintiff wife pursuant to.a separation agreement dated July 1,1965.

The plaintiff had commenced two actions for báek alimony, one covering the period from November 15,1972 to September 15,

1973 and the second covering a period from .October 15, 1973 to March 16, 1974. Both actions w-ere' consolidated by prior motions of plaintiff and at the commencement of trial counsel stipulated to allow both actions to cover two 12-month periods commencing with November 15, 1972 and ending with October 15,1974 with an ad damnum…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nichols v. NicholsNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Ridgely Operating Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Steckler v. StecklerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  4. Martin v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Openshaw v. OpenshawUtah Supreme Court · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gomez v. GomezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. McNeal v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  3. Hildahl v. HildahlNevada Supreme Court · 1979
  4. McNeal v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API