Ridgely Operating Co. v. White
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
This suit was tried on counts 1 and 3. They allege that defendant was operating the “Ridgely’’ as an apartment house or hotel, whereby it maintained dominion and control over the hallways, elevators, stairways, entrances, etc. In count 1 it is alleged that plaintiff delivered to defendant her trunk “for the purpose of having the same placed in plaintiff’s apartment in said Ridgely, to-wit, rooms 705-6 on the seventh floor of said apartment.” In count 3 it is alleged that plaintiff delivered her trunk to said apartment house or hotel, and into the hallway, but does not…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Southern Ry. Co. v. DicksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- American Ry. Express Co. v. ReidSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Roman v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
- Higman v. CamodySupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Stringer v. Alabama Mineral RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. MurphySupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Francis v. Imperial Sanitary Laundry & Dry Cleaning Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Arrick v. FanningAlabama Court of Appeals · 1950
- Sealy v. McElroySupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- Lewis v. EbersoleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.