Legal Opinion

Hill v. Borough of Dormont

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 5, 1985No. Appeal, No. 1618 C.D. 1984PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Doyle,

John W. Hill (Appellant) seeks our review of an order dismissing his exceptions to a decree nisi which was entered by the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County dismissing Appellant’s complaint in equity in which he demanded that enforcement of section 22.16 of the Dormont Borough Code of Ordinances (Dormont Ordinances) be enjoined and that the same section be ordered rescinded.1

Licensing :and permit requirements for certain activities which are carried on in Dormont Borough (Borough) are set forth under Article II of Chapter 22 of the Dormont Ordinances. Effective…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Hines v. WinfreeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Warner Bros. Theatres, Inc. v. Pottstown BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Bernice v. Borough of FolcroftCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Murray v. Williams, BurgessSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. M & D Properties, Inc. v. Borough of Port VueCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Thompson v. City of Altoona Code Appeals BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Talley v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Rogers v. Zoning Hearing Board of East Pikeland TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. National Properties, Inc. v. Borough of MacUngieCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API