Murray v. Williams, Burgess
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Arnold, J.,
This appeal is from a judgment in mandamus directing the appellant-burgess to issue licenses to the appellee for five pin ball machines on tender of the license fees.
An ordinance of the Borough of Elizabeth provided that: (1) No person shall possess a device for a game known as “pin ball” without procuring a license; (2) an application for license shall be made to the Burgess in writing, and under oath, setting forth: (a) his present and previous occupation; (b) the length of his present and his previous place of residence; (c) the name of the owner of the premises where…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kaufman Construction Co. v. HolcombSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Tanenbaum v. D'AscenzoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Kistler v. Swarthmore BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Stefanich v. Beaver FallsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bernice v. Borough of FolcroftCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Hill v. Borough of DormontCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Earhart v. Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Cambridge Springs Borough v. KinestonCrawford County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1953