Legal Opinion
Allied Tube and Conduit Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided December 12, 2000No. SLIP OP. 00-160; 98-11-03135PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CARMAN, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff moves for judgement on agency record pursuant to U.S. CIT R. 56.2., contending it is entitled to judgement as a matter of law because, in the administrative proceeding below, Commerce, rendered two decisions that were unsupported by record evidence and were otherwise not in accordance with law. Certain Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Thailand, 63 Fed.Reg. 55578 (October 16, 1998) (Final Results). First, Plaintiff asserts Commerce incorrectly used the invoice date rather than the contract date as the date of sale for subject merchandise exported to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. The United States and Zenith Radio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Rhone Poulenc, Inc. And Rhone Poulenc Chimie De Base, S.A. v. The United States, Pq CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Timex V.I., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Hebei Metals & Minerals Import & Export Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
- Nucor Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
- Allied Tube and Conduit Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- Tembec, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Viraj Group, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.