Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Rose

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 22, 2004PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpain, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 11, 2003, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

On February 11, 2003, claimant filed for unemployment insurance benefits after leaving his part-time employment delivering newspapers and having apparently been terminated from his full-time job. Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant voluntarily left his part-time employment without good…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of MaineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. In re the Claim of RainvilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. In re the Claim of ChipmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. In re the Claim of RoseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. In re the Claim of DingmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. In re the Claim of DingmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API