Legal Opinion

Angelus Securities Corp. v. Ball

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 19, 1937No. Civ. No. S. C. 29PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITE, J., pro tem.

We have this day filed an opinion in case No. S. C. 37 (ante, p. 423 [67 Pac. (2d) 152]), which involves questions presented in litigation out of which this appeal arises. While reference may be had to that case for a more complete statement of the facts, those involved in the appeal now before us, in brief, are as follows:

On April 15, 1931, and for several months prior thereto, respondent corporation had as its board of directors Messrs. Luton, Crowe, Woodward, Ball, Harriss, Seamans, Breslin and Cruiekshank. Of these, Luton was president, Crowe, Woodward and Harriss were…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Victor Oil Co. v. DrumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Wickersham v. CrittendenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Lomita Land and Water Co. v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Western States Life Ins. Co. v. LockwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Angelus Securities Corp. v. BallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Remillard Brick Co. v. Remillard-Dandini Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. Lawrence v. I. N. Parlier Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Broadway Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Sammis v. StaffordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. Smith v. SperlingDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API