Legal Opinion
Bujanda v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided January 31, 1980No. 2 CA-CIV 3346PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*315OPINION
HOWARD, Judge.
This appeal was taken from the trial court’s denial of a new trial after it directed a verdict for appellee, Montgomery Ward & Co.
Appellants, having seen a newspaper advertisement offering hair permanents at a special price, went to appellee’s store. They contend that the permanents were negligently done causing physical injury to both and psychological damage to Mrs. Bujanda. Their complaint alleged that Montgomery Ward owned and operated the beauty shop, that Montgomery Ward employed the persons who injured them, and that the negligence of these employees caused the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Eudy v. EudySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Gilmore v. CohenArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Schumann v. McGinnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Associated Engineers & Contractors, Inc. v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
- In Re Estate of McCauleyArizona Supreme Court · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- SWC Baseline & Crismon Investors, L.L.C. v. Augusta Ranch Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Magma Copper Co. v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONAArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Parker, Springer Jr., Anderson v. Committee for Sustainable Retirement in Support of InitiativeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Lininger v. Dine Out Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
- Magma Copper Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.