Legal Opinion

Dime Savings Bank v. Perlucci, No. Cv 96-0151353 S (Dec. 29, 2000)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided December 29, 2000No. CV 96-0151353 SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION CT Page 16315

The plaintiff initiated a foreclosure action against the defendants. The defendants counterclaimed contending that the plaintiff, at some point subsequent to the signing of the note and mortgage, had failed to comply with a workout agreement reached by the parties. The defendant claimed the case to the jury trial list. The plaintiff filed the subject motion, a Motion to Strike from the Jury List, claiming that since equitable actions cannot be tried to a jury, the counterclaim…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States Trust Co. v. BohartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Connecticut National Bank v. RytmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. Texaco, Inc. v. GolartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. Berry v. Hartford National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  5. Connecticut Housing Finance Authority v. John Fitch Court Associates Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Superior Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API