Legal Opinion
State v. Kinard
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided December 18, 2001No. 19633-0-IIIPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
36 P.3d 573 (2001)
109 Wash.App. 428
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Odell KINARD Jr., Appellant.
No. 19633-0-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel One.
December 18, 2001.
William D. Edelblute, Attorney at Law, Spokane, for Appellant.
Kevin M. Korsmo, Andrew J. Metts, Spokane, for Respondent.
SWEENEY, J.
A photomontage is admissible unless it is so "impermissibly suggestive as to give rise to a very substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification...." State v. Barker, 103 Wash.App. 893, 905, 14 P.3d 863 (2000), review denied, 143 Wash.2d 1021, 25 P.3d 1019 (2001). Here, the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. DaughertyWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. HilliardWashington Supreme Court · 1977
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. SalinasCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- State v. KloepperCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- State v. SanchezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- State v. BirchCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State v. BirchCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.