Legal Opinion

State v. Kloepper

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 4, 2014No. 30294-6-IIIPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Koksmo, C.J. —

¶1 Cody Kloepper challenges his convictions for first degree rape, first degree burglary, and first degree assault, primarily arguing that the victim should not have been allowed to identify him at trial. We affirm the convictions and sentence.

FACTS

¶2 D.W. awoke in her fourth floor Richland apartment at 4:00 a.m. to prepare for work. An unknown man with long hair attacked her and struck her repeatedly on the head with a metal bar. The two struggled and D.W. defecated in her pants. When asked why he was attacking her, the man responded, “[B]ecause Obama was elected president.”…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Perry v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. Sassen Van ElslooWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State of Washington v. Dahndre Kavaugn WestwoodCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  3. Personal Restraint Petition Of Mark Jonathan GossettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. State Of Washington v. B.j.c.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  5. State Of Washington v. Dahndre K. WestwoodCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API