Legal Opinion

Conkling v. Erie Railroad

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 19, 1899PublishedCited by 14 opinions

On error to the Supreme Court. The facts appear fully in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hendrickson, J.

The controversy in this case arises ■over the denial of a motion to nonsuit the plaintiff on the -ground of contributory negligence. The suit was for injuries to his person and property by a collision of the defendant’s railway train with the plaintiff’s ice wagon, which he was engaged in driving over the Crooks avenue crossing in the suburbs of Paterson.

*340The train was the midday express. It had left the station at Paterson and was on its way to Jersey City, and was traveling at the speed of from thirty-five to forty miles an hour.

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gorton v. . the Erie Railway CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. West Jersey Railroad v. EwanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
  3. Pennsylvania Railroad v. PfuelbSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897
  4. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. HefferanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1894

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Birmingham Southern R. Co. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  2. MACCIA EX REL. MACCIA v. TynesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  3. Cathcart v. Oregon-Washington R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Testo v. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Dickinson v. Erie RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API