Legal Opinion

MACCIA EX REL. MACCIA v. Tynes

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 30, 1956PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

39 N.J. Super. 1 (1956)

120 A.2d 263

FRANK MACCIA, AN INFANT BY VICTOR MACCIA, HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, AND VICTOR MACCIA, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

CHARLES TYNES, T/A CHARLES CLEANERS & DYERS, AND WILLIAM G. MAYO, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued January 9, 1956.

Decided January 30, 1956.

Before Judges CLAPP, JAYNE and FRANCIS.

Mr. Ralph G. Mesce argued the cause for plaintiffs-appellants (Mr. Americus S. Muti, attorney).

Mr. Melvin B. Cohen argued the cause for defendants-respondents (Messrs. Lowenstein & Cohen, attorneys).

The opinion of the…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Markley v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Bush v. Harvey Transfer Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Tisdale v. Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  4. Funk v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  5. Kelley v. CurtissSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Orr v. CrowderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Colonial Stores, Inc. v. ScarbroughSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  3. Aden v. FortshSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  4. Blazovic v. AndrichSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  5. Mungin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1995

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API